In Moscow, Volunteers Keeping An Eye on the People Next Door
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, November 16, 2004; Page A21
MOSCOW -- In her former life as a top Communist Party official at a closed
military factory in Samara, a city on the Volga River, Albina Tsareva helped
enforce ideological conformity and general discipline among the workers.
Now living in retirement in northwest Moscow, Tsareva, 66, is still on the
lookout for anti-social behavior. "We want to make our community
better," she said. "Safe, secure and healthy."
Albina Tsareva, 66, is chairwoman of a
public order council in Moscow. Critics compare the networks
to informants and Soviet-style monitoring. (Peter
Finn -- The Washington Post
|
|
Tsareva heads a network of 190 volunteers who keep an eye out for suspicious
people and questionable behavior at 51 apartment buildings, courtyards and parks
in Moscow's Shukino district. In her role as chairwoman of the Public Order
Council in Territorial Administrative Unit No. 4, she describes herself
half-jokingly as "Czar and God."
The Moscow city council this month passed a law and appropriated $3 million to
create public order councils in each of Moscow's 676 subdistricts. Backers
describe the measure as a kind of neighborhood watch that will involve ordinary
people in the fight against terrorism, crime, public drunkenness and vandalism.
"Without the help of the citizens it is impossible to have security,"
said Inna Svyatenko, a Moscow city council member and the bill's sponsor.
"And our goal is to promote the people's participation."
But critics view the public order councils as an attempt to return to
Soviet-style monitoring of the citizenry and the resurrection of the feared stukach,
or informer, in Russian life.
"Of course in Russia, people should be concerned about security, but this
law is another government tool, not a citizen initiative," said Lev
Ponomarev, executive director of the All-Russia Public Movement for Human
Rights. "It's very Soviet, and it exploits the fact that some people will
inform on their neighbors with pleasure."
Reacting to the threat of terrorist attacks across the country, local and
federal authorities have proposed numerous initiatives designed to strengthen
security. But some of the measures have kindled unpleasant memories. In Soviet
times, so-called Public Order Squads informed on people suspected of criminal
behavior and disloyalty to the government. Sometimes, little more than the word
of an informer sent people to prison.
Another volunteer corps, the druzhina, or people's patrol, whose roots go
back to Czarist times when it acted as a loyalist security force, has also been
revived in recent years. "The druzhina are law-abiding citizens who work
with the executive power on all issues related to public security," said
Oleg Cherkasov, head of the druzhina in the northern district of Moscow.
He said members of the druzhina, wearing red armbands, patrol parks and streets,
and help with crowd control at public gatherings. "In the past the druzhina
had very communist tasks and purposes," Cherkasov said. "But now we
are just helping the police."
Svyatenko said any comparison of her initiative with Soviet times distorts an
attempt to build community activism, commonplace in Western Europe and the
United States. She said the councils give police another security tool as they
seek to avoid attacks such as the apartment building bombings in Moscow and
other cities that killed more than 300 people in 1999.
"The law very clearly lays out the rights and responsibilities of the
activists," said Svyatenko, a member of the United Russia party, which
backs President Vladimir Putin. "They are not police and they are not
informants. They are volunteers who are giving their time for nothing."
Besides monitoring the community, Tsareva said her volunteers have worked to
preserve a local park, restored broken-down playgrounds and are creating an art
program for young people.
"This isn't about informing," she said. "I don't even understand
how people can use that word. It's about having a good and safe place to
live."
The public councils began with a pilot program in the Tagansky district of
Moscow last year. It was supposed to be expanded across the city last January,
but the new bill with secure financing only passed this month, Svyatenko said.
Local officials said they welcomed the initiative. "The police are
incapable of watching everything," said Sergei Krupin, an official in the
Shukino district. "We remember our history, how people were informants, and
that's very painful. On the other hand, the police need help. There is no other
way."
But many human rights activists fear that the volunteers are most likely to be
retired police or security officials as well as old-style bureaucrats, such as
Tsareva. The Tagansky pilot project was reviled in the press because one of its
most prominent activists happily told reporters about his days as an informer in
Soviet times. He declined to be interviewed for this article, saying he no
longer spoke to the press.
Critics also fear that the council members will report on people who are thought
to be suspicious simply because they are different.
"This is going to encourage xenophobia, which is already a problem,"
Ponomarev said. "Who are they going to report on? Chechens and foreigners,
of course."
Tsareva said the biggest issue raised by the door monitors and "house
seniors" under her watch was "who their neighbors are."
"There are a lot of newcomers here and people want to know who they
are," she said. "That's the main issue."
Source
www.OttawaMensCentre.com